Stanley Jones
Clean Slate Project
"Working to Build A Better Community"

HOME | MISSION | ABOUT US | PROJECTS | SCHOLARS | LINKS | CONTACT US

"The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just."
~ Abraham Lincoln

CORI LEGISLATION

CORI &
EX-OFFENDERS

EX-OFFENDER HOUSING DISCRIMINATION
THE BIG PICTURE: REALITY IN THE U.S.

THE REALITY IN MASSACHUSETTS

THE LAW IN MASSACHUSETTS

COMMUNITY RESOURCES IN MASSACHUSETTS
Resource List

PROGRAMS IN OTHER STATES

REFORM RECOMMENDATIONS 

HOW YOU CAN HELP


COMMUNITY RESOURCES IN ACTION
outreach challenges & goals / networks & awareness / referral / alliance / individual needs / the future  / GLOSSARY

overview of research: community resources for ex-offenders
Outreach Challenges & Goals
Mobilization around ex-offender housing issues depends on advocacy organizations and service providers working on the challenges that ex-offenders and members of other marginalized communities face. Like other marginalized groups, ex-offenders frequently experience what scholars and activists have described as “a synergy of plagues” whereby a series of individual challenges of re-entry complicate and compound each other. As material on the Personal Barriers and Social and Legal Barriers pages of this website suggest, resources that target those who are homeless, mentally ill, who live in poverty, and who may suffer from chronic illness including HIV/AIDS, also serve ex-offenders in various phases of post-incarceration re-entry. Different organizations may specialize in one area of re-entry work, such as housing. Even so, there is wide acknowledgment that related issues, such as employment and health, must often be addressed hand-in-hand. This acknowledgment is reflected in a growing referral network among those involved in re-entry work.

Networks & Awareness
Many advocates and service delivery organizations that are working with other marginalized groups have stretched their resources in order to also address the needs of ex-offenders. This has led to the broadening and strengthening of a network of advocates who have come to associate their work with the challenges of ex-offender re-entry. In other words, organizations that in the past may not have been poised to deal with the particular re-entry needs of ex-offenders may now be working to tailor their services to ex-offender’s needs and endeavoring to receive necessary funding to support that work. On the other hand, there is growing awareness that housing advocates must oppose the established default trend of using emergency shelters as dumping grounds for ex-offenders who lack other more suitable housing options. 

Referral
Ex-offenders often need referrals from the Department of Corrections (DOC) to avoid landing in a shelter. Ex-offenders must often have these DOC referrals in order to access the transitional housing services that are best able to address their specific needs. The fact that transitional programs are notoriously under-funded constrains program outreach and service provision.

Like other marginalized groups, ex-offenders frequently experience what scholars and activists have described as “a synergy of plagues” whereby a series of individual challenges of re-entry complicate and compound each other.

Alliance
Alliances between the DOC and transitional service providers are shifting to address the inadequacy and inappropriateness of using shelters as dumping grounds for ex-offenders in search of viable housing options. One specific partnership between the DOC and transitional service providers has emerged in the form of the Corrections Committee, sponsored by the Massachusetts Housing and Shelter Alliance.  These new partnerships are making important (but still insufficient) efforts to incorporate the views of ex-offenders who have personally faced the challenges of re-entry. 

There have been recent moves to create institutional fire-walls between transitional service providers and Departments of Correction in order to diminish the prohibitive stigma that this association may have for ex-offenders. It is not clear if ex-offenders are nonetheless inhibited from utilizing non-governmental services to which they are referred by the Department of Corrections. Non-uptake of transitional services may also be due to lack of necessary referrals, limited resources and long wait lists. Alliances mobilizing around housing and re-entry are currently striving to address these challenges.

Individual Needs
There is also increasing recognition of the need to provide an array of programs for ex-offenders who must be properly triaged upon release. For instance, some ex-offenders would be better served by sober houses, while others may benefit from a program with an attitudinal adjustment component. In still other cases, neither of these types of programs may be relevant to an individual ex-offender’s particular re-entry needs.

Services provided to ex-offenders by shelters and transitional programs must always respond to changes in funding, political shifts, and the needs of the populations they serve. 

The Future
The campaign to address the challenges faced by ex-offenders is gaining momentum.  Coalitions among corrections officers, politicians, housing access advocates, and many others working with ex-offenders are developing improved infrastructure.  There is growing optimism that the policy recommendations provided by these coalitions will be positively received.


Top of Page

 

To view the entire Northeastern University School of Law Community Lawyering Program report on Ex-Offender Housing Discrimination including footnotes, click here.